
If the trajectory is almost straight up, where does the gun have to be?
Even if you’ve only “fired” a squirt gun, you already know the answer!
Advertisement

If the trajectory is almost straight up, where does the gun have to be?
Even if you’ve only “fired” a squirt gun, you already know the answer!
The gun is in Jackie’s hand hidden inside a small stuffed toy that was give to her sometime between the airport and that moment of entering the limousine.
There was a shot just as they entered in front of the sign where President Kennedy grabs his neck, Jackie then has her hand positioned under his neck, brain matter is splattereed “up and to the left”. Then Jackie as she is scrabbling to the truck her hand goes between the seat and trunk is then on top of the trunk grabbing for the casing and it told to go back to the seat…http://letsrollforums.com/supporting-thread-jfk-t19334.html?t=19334
Hi, Megan, and thanks for your comment. I, too, ran into that “small white dog” or “lambchop puppet” story; but I rejected it for the account that Jackie was given a small bouquet of white flowers by someone at the airport. Here is a link to a photo on the JFK Lancer Site of the backseat shortly after the assassination http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/limo/ce352a.jpg and I believe you can see for yourself that this is a bouquet of flowers. No little white stuffed animal is in sight. If there was one, what happened to it? The silence is deafening so I chalk it up to bad eyesight and photo clarity on Mary Moorman’s part.
I agree that Jackie looks like she’s grabbing for something on the trunk of the car. And one-shot revolvers DO eject a casing! So I’m open to that idea. But when researchers insist that the trunk of the car was pristine and clean of morbid debris, we have this photo, also available at the JFK Lancer site: http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/limo/Debris2.JPG. Thus, I can’t rule out the possibility that Jackie, in perhaps a trance-like, trauma-induced state, did really reach for a piece of her husband’s head. Or, as I speculate, she may just have gone into escape mode when the shot from the grassy knoll came right toward her!
Thank you for your support of my hypothesis that Jackie Kennedy may have participated in the murder of her husband, John F. Kennedy.
I think it doesn’t matter too much where the gun came from. It obviously it came with the help of CIA by whatever meanings. If we look carefully it should be at least two more persons who were directly involved at first glance: the driver who pressed the brake and looked twice back to wait for the CIA agent who came at the back of the car, and the CIA agent who came to ensure that the “mission” is a success and recover the handgun from Jackie (by me this the reason for Jackie jumping on the top of the trunk). It was a professional hit and nothing from that poor detailed clip wasn’t a careless action and we can more details and motives on this link: http://jewsribsinbearjaw.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/the-zapruder-film/ (it’s not mine i just run into it). Take care!
Hi, Adrian, and thanks for commenting. I totally agree with what you’ve written as to the whereabouts of the gun at
different times during the action. What I meant, though, by “Where is the gun that caused this trajectory?” was “Where
would the gun have to be held by the shooter to cause that particular trajectory?” The angle of the shot certainly points
to a weapon being held low and pointed up and to the right, which would point to Jackie as the one being able to hold a
gun at that angle. See what I mean? Thanks for the link and some interesting points to ponder!
It was the “purse gun”
Hi, Andrew! Glad to have you as a “true believer” in the theory that Jackie shot him too. The gun could very well have been in her purse but there’s no footage of her reaching down and fumbling with her handbag to retrieve it or put it back. It is true that her hands aren’t very visible during the motorcade so it’s possible. Maybe it was rigged to come down her sleeve and right into her hand. Wherever it was hiding, she retrieved it and used it, amen?
watch http://www.documentarycorner.com/jfk2/
Hi, Margaret, and thanks for writing. That documentary is great, isn’t it? Be sure you’re watching the long version. I love how he explains who and what Oswald really was: an agent working directly under JFK’s orders. I have this link on my Oswald page on my bigger site at: http://www.jackiekilledjfk.webs.com. The Bushes are a vicious crime family just like the Clintons, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and Obama/Sotoeros.